More junk patents
Four years ago, Amazon.com patented "One-Click Shopping." At about the same time, a British company patented the "hyperlink." Companies routinely patent ridiculous inventions or processes so they can use those patents as leverage in the future. Junk technology patents are so common that Slashdot even has a category just for junk patent stories. The patent system is broken, as a recent study revealed that there are mistakes in 98% of U.S. patents that might affect that patent's enforceability; but beyond those mistakes, patents are issued for things at are either clearly prior art (one of the things that is un-patentable is an invention that has already been widely used before you tried to patent it; this is called "prior art")
Here are some things that have been patented in the last year:
- Microsoft: "Pausing television programming in response to selection of hypertext link"
- Amazon: A system for allowing users to post reviews of products they have purchased
- Nintendo: A system that causes a video game character to hallucinate and became temporarily "insane"
- Amazon: "Contextual presentation of information about related orders during browsing of an electronic catalog"
- Amazon: "Using customer viewing histories to generate recommendations"
And, today, Cingular was awarded a patent for the emoticon:
The method and system described in the patent allows a user of a mobile phone (or other device) to select a displayable icon, such as an emoticon, that indicates the mood or emotion of the user or conveys other information independent of text. In some embodiments, the selected displayable icon is inserted into a text message or screen, such as an instant message, chat screen, or user text field.
Realistically, Cingular is not going to sue everyone who uses a smiley face in an IM conversation without paying them first, although that is now their right. Patents are used as leverage, but they can also be used to stifle innovation and create collusion. A sample conversation between an executive at Cingular and an executive at Yahoo:
Cingular: Hey, what's going on?Yahoo: Oh, nothing much. There's a lot of problems with our software, but I decided to take the morning off. I'm playing Yahtzee now. Man, it's so hard to get a Yahtzee! It's like, I get four of a kind and then I can't get a fifth one, and I already have four of a kind, so I have to take a 0 for the Yahtzee.
Cingular: That's great. Listen: you heard that we got the patent for emoticons, right?
Yahoo: What? They actually awarded you that patent? I thought it was ridiculous when Amazon got the patent for customer reviews, but I guess anything's possible. Are you guys still spending lots of money defeating patent reform?
Cingular: Hells, yes! Innovation is expensive, and it costs me valuable time that I could be spending at the golf course or watching Desperate Housewives on my video iPod.
Yahoo: Desperate Housewives?
Cingular: Okay, so it was a screener copy of King Kong that I got from BitTorrent.
Yahoo: Wait a second -- isn't that illegal?
[Laughter.]
Cingular: Oh, man, you crack me up. Seriously, though: we've got the patent on emoticons and we were wondering something.
Yahoo: Yeah?
Cingular: We don't want you offering VoIP or anything like that Google Talk. If people start making phone calls over the Internet, then they won't pay us exorbitant cell phone fees on an archaic rate structure with Draconian penalties for doing anything we don't like.
Yahoo: Okay, but what's in it for us?
Cingular: Well, when we start our litigation against instant messaging companies for using emoticons without paying us, maybe . . . well, all I'm saying is that maybe Yahoo will be accidentally left off the list.
Yahoo: Ohh, I see. So, if we kill voice over the Internet so that you can retain your outdated business model, you won't sue us for using a technology that was dubiously patented by you?
Cingular: I wish you could see me touching my nose with my finger.
Yahoo: Well, since there's no voice calls over the Internet, there won't be any video calls over the Internet, so it looks like I'll never see it!
[Laughter.]
Cingular: Hey, you want to come over to my mansion in Sunnyvale tonight? We're going to invite Nokia over, ply him with whiskey, and then convince him to disable all the cool technology in his new phone unless the customer pays us an outrageous subscription fee.
Yahoo: Dude, that sounds awesome! But I can't; Microsoft, Google, and me are getting together to talk about how we can get a market foothold in Iran. We figure we'll just censor everything but the "death to Israel" websites.
Cingular: Oh, man, dude. I don't know; that sounds like more fun than beating up on Nokia.
Yahoo: Well, there's tons of totalitarian regimes that need Internet access. I'll call you next time we talk with one. Hey, we're going to visit Saudi Arabia next week. Wanna come?
Cingular: Awesome! I'll be there. Okay, I have to go write up a patent for using a non-Roman font to insert the letters of my sorority into my instant messenger profile. I'll talk to you later.
Yahoo: Okay, dude. Later.

Comments
mark... if you do not read fafblog, then you need to start. i give you this one for free:
http://fafblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/q-our-omnipotent-president-q.html
all the best!
Posted by: matt | January 27, 2006 6:33 AM
This would seem to ignore the fact that Yahoo Messenger already offers a phone service via a headset (not that it would be above Yahoo to downgrade it's services.) Also, if you use a webcam with SuperWebcam activated, bam ... voice and video. Again, it would hardly be a shock to see Yahoo come out with an updated version of it's messenger that was handi-capable.
On to the censorship issue. China has it's own laws. So does Saudi Arabia. We may not like the fact that they don't have free speech, but guess what, they don't. The fact that Google made an effort to comply with Chinese law does not bother me anymore than it bothers me that people in America can get arrested for looking at child porn that isn't outlawed in East Gerrekjeyuvic. The internet is about the free expression of ideas, but even in our beloved United States there are certain things you can not get away with. Hey Saudi Arabia and Iran are oppressive, they don't let women walk down the street unattended, and whatnot. But I'm the modern American Businesswoman, I'm doing what I want and when I want, just like my hero Ally McBeal ... in fact, I'll wear a miniskirt, because I'm an American and even though I'm in someone else's country, they have to abide by my standards. Surely jailarity won't ensue. Chinese law is Chinese law. Why is it that in some countries they eat dogs, cats, horses, donkeys, but in many places in this country killing a dog for food would be "cruelty to animals" and an arrest? If you don't like the laws of a country, fine, but don't boycott a company for obeying the laws while operating within that countries borders, even if they are digital borders. I know this wasn't the focal point of your whole dealie, but I'm fed up with this whole "google censorship debate". You're not in China, it doesn't affect you, shut up.
Posted by: Wolf | January 29, 2006 1:20 PM