" /> SEDHE: January 2007 Archives

« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

January 28, 2007

Tom Waits music in Oakland

OAKLAND -- A few months ago, I saw Tom Waits on The Daily Show. I had heard only the name, and I had no idea what kind of music he played. As it turns out, he's incredibly eclectic, having written and performed dozens of kinds of (mostly experimental) music over the last thirty years. At the end of the show, he played a tremendous version of "The Day After Tomorrow," from his last album.

Yesterday, I got a call from a friend who told me that three different local bands were playing Tom Waits songs on strange instruments at 21 Grand in Oakland. Would I like to go?

Of course!

At 8:30 PM (more or less), we arrived at 21 Grand, paid $10, and watched as three different bands -- all dressed in 1940s-era clothing -- played Tom Waits songs on ukelele, mandolin, kazoo, guitar, organ, and accordion. During one song, they simulated the crackling and popping noises of an old record by crinkling a plastic candy wrapper in front of the microphone. Brilliant! The only problem is that they didn't play my favorite song, "Eggs and Sausage," from his first album (back in 1970-something), Nighthawks at the Diner.

January 18, 2007

Alberto Gonzales: SEDHE Villain of the Forever

Well, it was bound to happen sooner or later. In a speech at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think-tank, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales proclaimed that federal judges were unfit to rule on matters of national security. In scrutinizing federal judicial candidates, Gonzales said, "We want to determine whether he understands the inherent limits that make an unelected judiciary inferior to Congress or the president in making policy judgments."

Boy, I wish I could find the textual equivalent of a double-take.

Yes, folks; the US Attorney General just said that, in his opinion, the judiciary is inferior to Congress and the president. And it's a great opinion, except that it overlooks one little detail: the ... oh, what's it called? Constitution!

Did Alberto Gonzales even go to law school? Or did he "attend law school" in the same way that his boss "attended business school"? Gonzales is 100% wrong, wrong, wrong. The doctrines of both separation of powers and checks and balances ensure that each branch of government is equally powerful. The only places where you have executives that have far more authority than everyone else is in dictatorships or quasi-dictatorships (I'm looking at you, Venezuela and Bolivia).

Once again, George W. Bush -- the mouthpiece for Dick Cheney -- has asserted unilateral control of the country. And with what justification? Where is the evidence that the Constitution even considers the executive and the legislature superior in power to the judiciary? Yes, the Constitution gives the president the power to appoint judges -- with the advice and consent of the Senate -- but those judges are there for life. Furthermore, Congress can disband any federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court can rule on the constitutionality of legislation and presidential actions.

The idea that judges don't understand "this post-9/11 world" is ridiculous on its face. Judges are there to interpret the law and strike a balance between the requirements of the law and the requirements of reality. Cheney doesn't want a judiciary; he wants a robot that automatically approves all of the administration's activities. Ostensibly, this is another "unitary executive" privilege that comes from the nebulous interpretation of the president as "commander-in-chief," as though being the head of the armed forces is a carte blanche for overriding the Constitution.

The Founding Fathers were intimately aware of government power, having lived through the various Acts designed to extort taxes out of the colonies (the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, the Townsend Acts). They were terrified of government power, and in creating the Articles of Confederation, initially designed a country that was too weak. Thankfully, the Constitution of 1789 struck the balance between an overbearing federal government and a weak one.

Dick Cheney would love nothing more than to undo that. Ever since he worked for Nixon -- and even as a senator from Wyoming -- Cheney has tried his darndest to increase the power of the executive while at the same time decreasing the power of the legislature and the judiciary. Because, you see, if the legislature and the judiciary can check the executive, then the executive doesn't have unbridled power.

For engaging -- and continuing to engage -- in sheer stupidity when it comes to understanding both the law on its own and how that law should be balanced with national security, Alberto Gonzales earns the distinction of being a SEDHE Villain of the Forever.

January 13, 2007

Windows Vista doesn't suck that hard

SAN FRANCISCO -- Part of my job will require supporting users running Microsoft's newest operating system, Windows Vista. So I had to install it on my computer. My "computer" is actually a virtual machine running under Parallels Desktop for Mac on a 2.16 GHz 20" iMac Core 2 Duo. I'd love to have the Aero Glass interface (and, indeed, the 128 MB video card could handle it), but Windows doesn't recognize the special Parallels drivers, so it won't do anything like that.

Here's the low down: Windows Vista isn't as terrible as I thought it would be.

Security

Windows Vista actually enforces "administrator" rights like Unix does. This is good. What's bad, though, is that it does so in three different, inconsistent ways. Vista may ask you to "allow" a program (or installer) to run much like Windows XP SP2 requires you to allow certain programs to run. This prevents programs from installing stealthily, which was the major problem with Windows XP. Vista may ask you if you wish to "continue" with the execution of a program that it determines could be potentially risky. Finally, Vista may ask you to type in your full-blown administrator name and password. It may ask for all of these or a combination of them.

It's good that Vista has security in mind, but it's bad that Microsoft implemented security in a half-assed way. On Mac OS, if you want to install anything that's not a drag-and-drop into your own user folder, you must -- always! -- supply an administrator's name and password. No questions, no deviations. If you are about to install something on Mac OS that modifies the operating system, you have to be authenticated.

It's not enough that Vista requires you to click a button; certainly a smart program could create a macro that clicks the button or at least emulates, to the operating system, clicking a button. It's tremendously more difficult to find out your name and password. This is good for multiple users, as well; anyone who isn't an administrator could potentially install stuff on your computer just by clicking a button. They don't need to know a password.

Multiple users

Whereas Windows 9x had no multi-user support to speak of (except for multi-user logins which just saved some settings and Start Menu configurations), Windows XP did have support for multiple users. Windows Vista continues this trend, which is good. But, again, the benchmark for multiple-user support is Mac OS, where not only are one user's settings totally separate from another user's settings, but users can't even see each other's folders. In fact, not even an administrator can see other user's folders. Only the root user (which is disabled by default but can be enabled by any administrator) can see other user's folders. In Windows Vista, anyone can see anyone else's stuff. Why is this still going on?

Functionality

Vista took a nose-dive in the user interface department. It's more difficult in Vista to find what you're looking for than it was in Windows XP. For example, how do I find out my IP address? A user of moderate knowledge could go to a command line and type "ipconfig." But Windows Vista wants to be graphically based. Okay, let's bite. The first thing you would do is go to the Start Menu and then to Network. But Network doesn't display your network settings; it displays the stuff on your network. You'll need to click Network and Sharing Center in the menu bar of the Network window to get to the settings. The next window looks familiar; it's almost like the Network Settings control panel from Windows XP, but it provides a little more information. For example, if you're connected to a domain, it will tell you what the domain is. That's great! But it doesn't tell you what your IP address is. For that, you'll need to "View Status" of your local area connection. But even that doesn't tell you your IP address like it did in Windows XP. You must click "Details" and then you can figure out your IP address.

The Lowdown

Some people -- like major marketing companies -- would like you to believe that Windows Vista is a next-generation, super-duper operating system. It's not. It's merely the next iteration after Windows XP. Microsoft spent the last six years slowly stripping away features and, in the same way that they rewrote Windows 2000 and called it Windows XP, they rewrote Windows 2003 and called it Windows Vista. There's no reason to upgrade to Vista, especially if you have an older machine. The sexy Aero Glass interface will only work on machines with a real video card, so if you purchased a bargain-basement machine from Dell with onboard Intel video, you're out of luck. What you'll be using will look and act pretty much like Windows XP. And when the "Home Premium" version of Vista (which is the only "home" version that doesn't suck) costs $300, why bother?

January 1, 2007

The podcasting will begin soon

Now that I have a Samson C01U USB condenser microphone, I plan to start offering podcasts on this blog.

People have suggested recording comedy bits and putting them up. Perhaps I'll do that. In any case, look for MP3s in this space in the near future.

My entry to McSweeney's writing contest

Over the summer, McSweeney's had a contest in which entrants were to use one of thirteen writing prompts to generate a 1,000-word short story. Here's the prompt I used: "Write a story that ends with the following sentence: Debra brushed the sand from her blouse, took a last, wistful look at the now putrefying horse, and stepped into the hot-air balloon."

As it turns out, I didn't win. But, here is my story, anyway.

The Clown and the Librarian

As a boy, Leon had often imagined what it would have been like to be a professional clown. When he was seven years old, he told his parents – investment bankers both – about his aspirations. When they stopped sobbing, they asked him if that he was certain about his dreams. He emphatically nodded “yes.” They took him out of Lawrence Q. DeLaney’s School for the Unusually Wealthy and enrolled him in New Jersey State Clown Academy (“Where boys are made into men, and then those men are made into clowns”). For the next ten years of his life, he ate, slept, drank, and breathed clowns. He was first in his class in juggling, and at his graduation, he received the school’s highest honor – the Golden Rubber Nose with Distinction – for his one-man pantomime performance of Antigone while riding a unicycle over a tightrope. The headmaster commented afterward that it would have made Sophocles himself weep.

But the New Jersey State Clown Academy was only the beginning. Leon managed to secure a scholarship that sent him to Great Britain’s Royal Jestering College (for, you see, “clowning” is called “jestering” over there), where he excelled in such fields as designing comically oversized shoes and fitting several people at once into a tiny car. After four years, he emerged a changed man. He decided he would best be able to use his jestering abilities for the good of mankind (rather than for evil, as some clowns had done in the past, but they were always stopped by the good clowns) and joined a circus back in the United States.

His sordid love affair with Debra would become the stuff of pulp biographies. She was not a clown, but the clown’s sworn enemy: a librarian. Who is to say what drew the clown and the librarian together? His love of honking horns and her love of peace and quiet should have split them immediately, but no: there was a magic between them, the kind of magic that existed only once every few hundred years. There was magic between Antony and Cleopatra, between Abelard and Heloise, between Napoleon and Josephine.

After a brief period of courting in which Leon gave Debra one of those never-ending handkerchief things, and Debra gave Leon his very own pair of glasses to wear on the end of his nose, the two were engaged to be married. The marriage would take place on a beach, under a circus tent. Leon would invite his parents and his circus colleagues; Debra would invite her parents (retired rock musicians) and her colleagues from the library.

On the appointed day, they went down to the beach – careful to avoid the trash and syringes – and prepared to get married. On the groom’s side, the fire-breather, the lion-tamer, and the snake-charmer. On the bride’s side, several neat and uniform rows of men and women wearing more or less the same colors, sitting quietly with their hands folded on their laps, looking straight ahead and paying attention. And in the back, Debra’s parents, screaming, “Dude! Righteous wedding!” and holding up their lighters.

They were married by the ringmaster. Both the bride and groom looked marvelous, she in her beige wedding gown and he in his striped tuxedo, comically oversized patent leather shoes, and his diamond-studded dress nose.

After the ceremony, they had a reception on the beach in which everyone ate mounds of wedding cake. “Debra,” said Leon, “After spending so much time with you, I know that you have a fondness for romance novels in which women are swept off their feet by long-haired European men with chests like tanks. In my small way, I would like to make that dream come true.” He left the reception and went behind the tent, bringing with him a beautiful new horse. “Once I start working out and growing my hair long, I’m going to ride up to you on this horse and sweep you away to parts unknown. I’m also going to take lessons from a dialogue coach so I have an Italian accent.”

“Oh, Leon!” said Debra. “I have a surprise for you! Knowing you as well as I do, I discovered your fondness for random assortments of colored fabric sewn together. So I did the only thing I could think of to do.” She went off to the other side of the tent and brought back a hot-air balloon that she had sewn together herself.

Everyone was so happy to see the new couple offer each other these wonderful gifts of love. Leon’s parents clapped quietly, while Debra’s parents hollered and held up their lighters.

In this was the mistake.

The fire-breather, so full from wedding cake, let out an enormous belch. His breath, laden with gasoline, ignited the flame from Debra’s parents’ lighters and created an enormous fireball that hit the horse head-on. The horse was so shocked at being hit by a fireball that it fell over, dead and on fire. The force of the flame threw everyone to the ground.

The guests could only stare at the horse as it burned on the beach. They looked from the fire-breather to Debra’s parents and back to the horse. Debra didn’t move. Leon did the only thing he could think of: he jumped into the hot-air balloon and started the gas.

“Debra, come on! We must get away from this tragedy! Oh, what folly there is in the circus! I should have been an investment banker! Debra! We must leave this place and never return! We’ll start a new life in the jungle, as missionaries!”

Debra brushed the sand from her blouse, took a last, wistful look at the now putrefying horse, and stepped into the hot-air balloon.